
My garden is what you might call a small pseudo-woodland. Those who have seen it are probably already giggling, as it could equally accurately be described as a neglected mess, but bear with me, please.
The high storey of vegetation consists of sycamore trees (Acer pseudoplatanus), in my and my neighbours' gardens. The understorey contains large shrubs like elder (Sambucus nigra) and Forsythia. The groundcover consists largely of buttercup, or celandine (Ranunculus ficaria), bluebells (Hyancinthus) and spurge (Euphorbia). At the moment, there is an attractive burst of their various colours - the blue, white and pink bluebells, the green flowers of the spurge and the orangey-gold of the buttercups set each other off well.
One could certainly call that a typical woodland flora. There are a few anomalies, though. Sycamores are not native to the UK, they have naturalised over the last few hundred years. Because they have not co-existed with the insects of this country for all that long, they do not provide habitat for many species. Anyone who has parked their car under a sycamore in spring or summer and had it covered in honeydew (excreted by aphids in their millions) may dispute this point. I'm speculating here, but the non-native status of sycamore may just explain why aphids are so abundant on it. My hypothesis is that few of aphid's natural predators have found their niche in sycamore trees, whereas the aphids themselves have.
The bluebells are probably not native, either. These are unlikely to be the native bluebell found in old woodland throughout England, but more likely the larger Italian species, or a hybrid between them. Again, purists and ecologists would regard them as inferior to the native species, as they have not cohabited, so to speak, with the natives, so they do not have an established role in the ecosystem. I'm assuming that this is also the case with the spurges, as I don't think a native spurge would grow to almost three feet tall, as those in my garden do.
Funnily enough, the celandine is native, although it is regarded as a problem species in gardens, being very hard to eradicate. It's also known as pilewort, as it is reputed to help with the irritating condition called piles. Another hypothesis: that it has acquired this name through the shape of its miniature tubers (which scatter when you try to remove it - so often when inexperienced gardeners are weeding, instead of achiving the desired result of removing the plant, they are actually propagating multiple clones) - enough said.
Other vegetation includes nettles (Urtica dioica, native and lovely), lemon balm (Melissa officinalis, not native), Fatsia japonica (maybe native to Japan?) and loads of ivy (Hedera helix, native). There used to be a California lilic (Ceanothus) but it died. There's also a lot of a pretty variegated dead-nettle, don't know the Latin. Relics of previous tended gardens include a climbing pink rose, pampas grass, reeds. Weedy trees such as the sycamore and also the native ash (Fraxinus Exelsior, native) are seeding themselves. There are occasional brambles, although I tend to pull them out if I ever go out there, as they trip me up.
The common factor in most of these plants is that they are shade-tolerant. Obviously, that 's a big advantage in a woodland, and in a neglected patch of shady land, I suppose those are the species that will thrive.
I have occasionally thrown a few seeds on some bare soil, but nothing I have planted has been able to compete with the established vegetation. I don't think I'll try again. Many of the species may not be true natives, but they're doing OK and amidst the chaos, lots of insects and larger animals can find a niche.

